Phase 2 of CATALISE: a multinational and multidisciplinary Delphi consensus study of problems with language development: Terminology.
Judy Clegg; Joanne Volden; Alison H€uneke; Anne O’Hare; Elizabeth Brownlie; Saloni Krishnan; Stephanie Lynham; Mary Hartshorne; CiaraO’Toole; Linda Lascelles; Nancy Cohen; Brigid McNeill; Gina Conti-Ramsden; Glenn Carter; Carol-Anne Murphy; Julie Dockrell; Aoife Gallagher; Elina Mainela-Arnold; Mandy Grist; Dorothy V.M. Bishop; Gillian Baird; Lisa Archibald; Janet Dunn; Vicky Slonims; Sarah Spencer; Andrew Whitehouse; Sean Redmond; Paul A. Thompson; Marc Joanisse; Helen Stringer; Emma Gore-Langton; Helen Tager-Flusberg; Thomas Klee; Becky Clark; Margaret J. Snowling; James Law; Ann Bauer; Simon Gibbs; Suzanne Purdy; Jude Bellair; Jane Speake; Laida Restrepo; Rosemary Tannock; Laurence Leonard; Marleen Westerveld; Mabel Rice; Rhea Paul; Courtenay Norbury; Trisha Greenhalgh; Narad Mathura; Sally Kedge; Catherine Adams; Pamela Snow; Elspeth McCartney; Bruce Tomblin; Susan Ebbels; Janis Oram Cardy; Cristina McKean; Cate Taylor; Christopher Boyle; Angela Morgan
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2021042718126
Tiivistelmä
Background: Lack
of agreement about criteria and terminology for children’s language problems
affects access to services as well as hindering research and practice. We
report the second phase of a study using an online Delphi method to address
these issues. In the first phase, we focused on criteria for language disorder.
Here we consider terminology.
Methods: The Delphi
method is an iterative process in which an initial set of statements is rated
by a panel of experts, who then have the opportunity to view anonymised ratings
from other panel members. On this basis they can either revise their views or
make a case for their position. The statements are then revised based on panel feedback,
and again rated by and commented on by the panel. In this study, feedback from
a second round was used to prepare a final set of statements in narrative form.
The panel included 57 individuals representing a range of professions and
nationalities.
Results: We achieved
at least 78% agreement for 19 of 21 statements within two rounds of ratings.
These were collapsed into 12 statements for the final consensus reported here.
The term ‘Language Disorder’ is recommended to refer to a profile of
difficulties that causes functional impairment in everyday life and is associated
with poor prognosis. The term, ‘Developmental Language Disorder’ (DLD) was
endorsed for use when the language disorder was not associated with a known
biomedical aetiology. It was also agreed that (a) presence of risk factors
(neurobiological or environmental) does not preclude a diagnosis of DLD, (b)
DLD can co-occur with other neurodevelopmental disorders (e.g. ADHD) and (c)
DLD does not require a mismatch between verbal and nonverbal ability.
Conclusions:
This Delphi exercise highlights reasons for disagreements about
terminology for language disorders and proposes standard definitions and
nomenclature.
Kokoelmat
- Rinnakkaistallenteet [19206]