BONUS BASMATI Thematic Scoping/Vision Document: report outlining the main conflict and potential synergy areas in crossborder MSP. Deliverable 2.2
John R. Moodie; Karsten Dahl; Lise Schröder; Andrea Morf; Henning Sten Hansen; Hanna Luhtala; Miriam von Thenen; Berit C. Kaae; Alberto Giacometti; Aurelija Armoskaite; Michael Kull; Anne Erkkilä-Välimäki; Kerstin Schiele; Ida Maria Reiter; Solvita Strāķe
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2021042612628
Tiivistelmä
Addressing conflicts between marine interests and finding workable
solutions that can facilitate synergies between stakeholders is an important
task of spatial planning both onshore and in the sea. A general assumption
among many experts in marine/maritime spatial planning (MSP) is that promoting
synergies and coexistence can enhance spatial efficiency of marine uses and
possibly result in a more sustainable use of marine resources. However, in
order to promote cooperation, one needs to first establish a better
understanding of the crucial components of conflictive and synergetic planning
situations and important definitions related to this.
This scoping report examines conceptualisations and analytical perspectives
on work with conflicts and synergies in MSP in relation to the case studies of
the BONUS BASMATI project. The theme of conflicts and synergies is rather
topical, not least in connection with attempts of the EU and other actors to
promote growth in the blue economic sector and keep related environmental
impacts low. MSP is seen as an important tool or approach to promote and
achieve these goals (European Commission 2008; European Commission 2009;
European Commission 2012).
Chapter 1 provides introductory reflections on conflicts and
synergies in marine spatial planning using both an analytical narrative
complemented with examples from conflict theory. The aim is to provide the
reader with an easily understandable introduction into relevant terms used and
important issues to be considered when working with conflicts and synergies in
MSP. These include interests, stakeholders, institutional frameworks, rules,
systems and practices, space and geography, knowledge and technologies,
conflict-synergies in a broader context. The chapter concludes with an analysis
of conflict analysis and management literature and a discussion on the
potential role of conflict management in MSP.
Chapter 2 provides examples of conflicts and obstacles that have
emerged in a Baltic Sea Region (BSR) context and how, through people, planning
processes, projects and institutions synergies have been developed. The chapter
focuses on 1) Conflicts of interest: Marine use related conflicts / obstacles
and synergies, 2) Institutional cross-border conflicts / obstacles and
synergies, 3) Process related conflicts / obstacles and synergies, 4) Knowledge
and data related conflicts / obstacles and synergies, 5) Other types of obstacles
that are context related.
Chapter 3 zooms in on the three BONUS BASMATI case studies and
highlights emerging and potential conflicts and synergies within the case study
areas. It also suggests potential synergies and solutions for overcoming
challenges that can be addressed in the case studies and during the lifetime of
the project.
Kokoelmat
- Rinnakkaistallenteet [19207]