Development of a Fast SARS-CoV-2 IgG ELISA, Based on Receptor-Binding Domain, and Its Comparative Evaluation Using Temporally Segregated Samples From RT-PCR Positive Individuals
Natchu Uma Chandramouli; Gosain Mudita; Bhartia Vandita; Goswami Sandeep; Mehdi Farha; Verma Nikhil; Shrivastava Tripti; Sinha Sangita Kumari; Chattopadhyay Souvick; Yadav Sarla; Sopory Shailaja; Wadhwa Nitya; Kumar Manjit; Pandey Anil K; Lodha Rakesh; Thiruvengadam Ramachandran; Batra Gaurav; Kshetrapal Pallavi; Das Asim; Sharma Nandini; Lamminmäki Urpo; Bhatnagar Shinjini; Sharma Pragya; Desiraju Bapu Koundinya
Development of a Fast SARS-CoV-2 IgG ELISA, Based on Receptor-Binding Domain, and Its Comparative Evaluation Using Temporally Segregated Samples From RT-PCR Positive Individuals
Natchu Uma Chandramouli
Gosain Mudita
Bhartia Vandita
Goswami Sandeep
Mehdi Farha
Verma Nikhil
Shrivastava Tripti
Sinha Sangita Kumari
Chattopadhyay Souvick
Yadav Sarla
Sopory Shailaja
Wadhwa Nitya
Kumar Manjit
Pandey Anil K
Lodha Rakesh
Thiruvengadam Ramachandran
Batra Gaurav
Kshetrapal Pallavi
Das Asim
Sharma Nandini
Lamminmäki Urpo
Bhatnagar Shinjini
Sharma Pragya
Desiraju Bapu Koundinya
FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on:
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2021042825780
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2021042825780
Tiivistelmä
SARS-CoV-2 antibody detection assays are crucial for gathering seroepidemiological information and monitoring the sustainability of antibody response against the virus. The SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein's receptor-binding domain (RBD) is a very specific target for anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies detection. Moreover, many neutralizing antibodies are mapped to this domain, linking antibody response to RBD with neutralizing potential. Detection of IgG antibodies, rather than IgM or total antibodies, against RBD is likely to play a larger role in understanding antibody-mediated protection and vaccine response. Here we describe a rapid and stable RBD-based IgG ELISA test obtained through extensive optimization of the assay components and conditions. The test showed a specificity of 99.79% (95% CI: 98.82-99.99%) in a panel of pre-pandemic samples (n = 470) from different groups, i.e., pregnancy, fever, HCV, HBV, and autoantibodies positive. Test sensitivity was evaluated using sera from SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR positive individuals (n = 312) and found to be 53.33% (95% CI: 37.87-68.34%), 80.47% (95% CI: 72.53-86.94%), and 88.24% (95% CI: 82.05-92.88%) in panel 1 (days 0-13), panel 2 (days 14-20) and panel 3 (days 21-27), respectively. Higher sensitivity was achieved in symptomatic individuals and reached 92.14% (95% CI: 86.38-96.01%) for panel 3. Our test, with a shorter runtime, showed higher sensitivity than parallelly tested commercial ELISAs for SARS-CoV-2-IgG, i.e., Euroimmun and Zydus, even when equivocal results in the commercial ELISAs were considered positive. None of the tests, which are using different antigens, could detect anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgGs in 10.5% RT-PCR positive individuals by the fourth week, suggesting the lack of IgG response.
Kokoelmat
- Rinnakkaistallenteet [19207]