QUAREP-LiMi: A community-driven initiative to establish guidelines for quality assessment and reproducibility for instruments and images in light microscopy
Alexopoulos Ioannis; Aumayr Karin; Avilov Sergiy; Bagley Steve; Bajcsy Peter; Bakker Gert-Jan; Bammann Rodrigo R.; Bassi Andrea; Beckert Hannes; Beer Sebastian; Belyaev Yury; Bierwagen Jakob; Birngruber Konstantin A.; Bischof Johanna; Boehm Ulrike; Bosch Manel; Breitlow Juergen; Brown Claire M.; Cameron Lisa A.; Chalfoun Joe; Chambers James J.; Chen Chieh-Li; Conde-Sousa Eduardo; Corbett Alexander D.; Cordelieres Fabrice P.; Dauphin Aurélien; Del Nery Elaine; Dietzel Ralf; Dobbie Ian M.; Eismann Frank; Eriksson John E.; Faklaris Orestis; Fazeli Elnaz; Felscher Andreas; Fernandez-Rodriguez Julia; Ferrand Alexia; Fried Hans; Gaudreault Nathalie; Gelman Laurent; Gheisari Ali; Goh Wah Ing; Guilbert Thomas; Hadleigh Roland; Hartmann Hella; Hemmerich Peter; Holst Gerhard A.; Itano Michelle S.; Jaffe Claudia B.; Jambor Helena K.; Jarvis Stuart C.; Keppler Antje; Kirchenbuechler David; Kirchner Marcel; Kobayashi Norio; Krens Gabriel; Kukat Christian; Kunis Susanne; Lacoste Judith; Laude Alex; Marcello Marco; Martins Gabriel G.; Metcalf Daniel J.; Mitchell Claire A.; Mitkovski Miso; Moore Joshua; Mueller Tobias; Munck Sebastian; Nelson Glyn; Nelson Michael S.; Nitschke Roland; North Alison J.; Ogg Stephen; Onami Shuichi; Palmer Alexandra L.; Paul-Gilloteaux Perrine; Pimentel Jaime A.; Plantard Laure; Podder Santosh; Rasse Tobias M.; Resch-Genger Ute; Rexhepaj Elton; Royon Arnaud; Saari Markku A.; Schapman Damien; Schoonderwoert Vincent; Schroth-Diez Britta; Schuetz Lucas C.; Schwartz Stanley; Seitz Arne; Shaw Michael; Spitaler Martin; Stoeckl Martin T.; Strambio-De-Castillia Caterina; Sudar Damir; Swedlow Jason R.; Teillon Jeremie; Terjung Stefan; Thuenauer Roland; Wilms Christian D.; Wright Graham D.
QUAREP-LiMi: A community-driven initiative to establish guidelines for quality assessment and reproducibility for instruments and images in light microscopy
Alexopoulos Ioannis
Aumayr Karin
Avilov Sergiy
Bagley Steve
Bajcsy Peter
Bakker Gert-Jan
Bammann Rodrigo R.
Bassi Andrea
Beckert Hannes
Beer Sebastian
Belyaev Yury
Bierwagen Jakob
Birngruber Konstantin A.
Bischof Johanna
Boehm Ulrike
Bosch Manel
Breitlow Juergen
Brown Claire M.
Cameron Lisa A.
Chalfoun Joe
Chambers James J.
Chen Chieh-Li
Conde-Sousa Eduardo
Corbett Alexander D.
Cordelieres Fabrice P.
Dauphin Aurélien
Del Nery Elaine
Dietzel Ralf
Dobbie Ian M.
Eismann Frank
Eriksson John E.
Faklaris Orestis
Fazeli Elnaz
Felscher Andreas
Fernandez-Rodriguez Julia
Ferrand Alexia
Fried Hans
Gaudreault Nathalie
Gelman Laurent
Gheisari Ali
Goh Wah Ing
Guilbert Thomas
Hadleigh Roland
Hartmann Hella
Hemmerich Peter
Holst Gerhard A.
Itano Michelle S.
Jaffe Claudia B.
Jambor Helena K.
Jarvis Stuart C.
Keppler Antje
Kirchenbuechler David
Kirchner Marcel
Kobayashi Norio
Krens Gabriel
Kukat Christian
Kunis Susanne
Lacoste Judith
Laude Alex
Marcello Marco
Martins Gabriel G.
Metcalf Daniel J.
Mitchell Claire A.
Mitkovski Miso
Moore Joshua
Mueller Tobias
Munck Sebastian
Nelson Glyn
Nelson Michael S.
Nitschke Roland
North Alison J.
Ogg Stephen
Onami Shuichi
Palmer Alexandra L.
Paul-Gilloteaux Perrine
Pimentel Jaime A.
Plantard Laure
Podder Santosh
Rasse Tobias M.
Resch-Genger Ute
Rexhepaj Elton
Royon Arnaud
Saari Markku A.
Schapman Damien
Schoonderwoert Vincent
Schroth-Diez Britta
Schuetz Lucas C.
Schwartz Stanley
Seitz Arne
Shaw Michael
Spitaler Martin
Stoeckl Martin T.
Strambio-De-Castillia Caterina
Sudar Damir
Swedlow Jason R.
Teillon Jeremie
Terjung Stefan
Thuenauer Roland
Wilms Christian D.
Wright Graham D.
WILEY
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on:
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2021093048670
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2021093048670
Tiivistelmä
A modern day light microscope has evolved from a tool devoted to making primarily empirical observations to what is now a sophisticated , quantitative device that is an integral part of both physical and life science research. Nowadays, microscopes are found in nearly every experimental laboratory. However, despite their prevalent use in capturing and quantifying scientific phenomena, neither a thorough understanding of the principles underlying quantitative imaging techniques nor appropriate knowledge of how to calibrate, operate and maintain microscopes can be taken for granted. This is clearly demonstrated by the well-documented and widespread difficulties that are routinely encountered in evaluating acquired data and reproducing scientific experiments. Indeed, studies have shown that more than 70% of researchers have tried and failed to repeat another scientist's experiments, while more than half have even failed to reproduce their own experiments. One factor behind the reproducibility crisis of experiments published in scientific journals is the frequent underreporting of imaging methods caused by a lack of awareness and/or a lack of knowledge of the applied technique. Whereas quality control procedures for some methods used in biomedical research, such as genomics (e.g. DNA sequencing, RNA-seq) or cytometry, have been introduced (e.g. ENCODE), this issue has not been tackled for optical microscopy instrumentation and images. Although many calibration standards and protocols have been published, there is a lack of awareness and agreement on common standards and guidelines for quality assessment and reproducibility. In April 2020, the QUality Assessment and REProducibility for instruments and images in Light Microscopy (QUAREP-LiMi) initiative was formed. This initiative comprises imaging scientists from academia and industry who share a common interest in achieving a better understanding of the performance and limitations of microscopes and improved quality control (QC) in light microscopy. The ultimate goal of the QUAREP-LiMi initiative is to establish a set of common QC standards, guidelines, metadata models and tools, including detailed protocols, with the ultimate aim of improving reproducible advances in scientific research. This White Paper (1) summarizes the major obstacles identified in the field that motivated the launch of the QUAREP-LiMi initiative; (2) identifies the urgent need to address these obstacles in a grassroots manner, through a community of stakeholders including, researchers, imaging scientists, bioimage analysts, bioimage informatics developers, corporate partners, funding agencies, standards organizations, scientific publishers and observers of such; (3) outlines the current actions of the QUAREP-LiMi initiative and (4) proposes future steps that can be taken to improve the dissemination and acceptance of the proposed guidelines to manage QC. To summarize, the principal goal of the QUAREP-LiMi initiative is to improve the overall quality and reproducibility of light microscope image data by introducing broadly accepted standard practices and accurately captured image data metrics.
Kokoelmat
- Rinnakkaistallenteet [19207]