dc.contributor.author | Skånes H | |
dc.contributor.author | Käyhkö N | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-10-28T14:21:18Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-10-28T14:21:18Z | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/170864 | |
dc.description.abstract | <p>This paper presents a methodological synthesis of two congruent
approaches into a common landscape change trajectory analysis and the
assessment of landscape dynamics and sustainability. The emphasis of the
analysis is on the retrospective relationship between the past and the
present-day landscape patterns and associated key biotopes. The example
key biotopes, oak woodlands and grasslands, represent valuable habitats
in the hemiboreal landscapes of Finland and Sweden. The paper presents a
conceptual stepwise approach for change trajectory analysis utilising
multiple spatio-temporal data and techniques available in image
processing and geographical information systems (GIS) including the
following steps: (I) specification of spatio-temporal data and their
representation of target objects, (II) the choice of direct or indirect
change trajectory analysis, (III) hierarchical structuring of landscape
information, (IV) compilation of landscape information into a GIS
database, and (V) identification of paths for landscape change
trajectory analysis. In this case study, we have focused on three
interlinked trajectory analysis approaches, and their role in the
assessment of landscape sustainability from a potential biodiversity
perspective. We conclude that proposed landscape change trajectory
analysis can improve the assessment of the key biotopes as well as
present-day landscape characteristics, in maintaining biodiversity and
related ecological values by providing information on landscape
stability, continuity, change processes and boundary dynamics. This
approach can be useful in the assessment of natural capital, but
requires data-specific and context sensitive data processing and
analysis solutions. The results should be interpreted as an
approximation and generalisation of the spatio-temporal complexity of
landscape reality and therefore be used in conjunction with additional
habitat function measures.</p> | |
dc.title | Change trajectories and key biotopes - Assessing landscape dynamics and sustainability | |
dc.identifier.urn | URN:NBN:fi-fe2021042720096 | |
dc.relation.volume | 75 | |
dc.contributor.organization | fi=maantiede|en=Geography | | |
dc.contributor.organization-code | 2606901 | |
dc.converis.publication-id | 36499921 | |
dc.converis.url | https://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/36499921 | |
dc.format.pagerange | 321 | |
dc.format.pagerange | 300 | |
dc.identifier.jour-issn | 0169-2046 | |
dc.okm.affiliatedauthor | Käyhkö, Niina | |
dc.okm.discipline | 1172 Environmental sciences | en_GB |
dc.okm.discipline | 1171 Geotieteet | fi_FI |
dc.okm.discipline | 1171 Geosciences | en_GB |
dc.okm.discipline | 1172 Ympäristötiede | fi_FI |
dc.okm.internationalcopublication | international co-publication | |
dc.okm.internationality | International publication | |
dc.okm.type | Journal article | |
dc.relation.doi | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.02.011 | |
dc.relation.ispartofjournal | Landscape and Urban Planning | |
dc.relation.issue | 3-4 | |
dc.year.issued | 2006 | |